<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>s3 on Mooncake</title>
    <link>https://mooncake.pgsty.com/tags/s3/</link>
    <description>Recent content in s3 on Mooncake</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    
    
    
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 19:17:16 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    
    
      <atom:link href="https://mooncake.pgsty.com/tags/s3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
        <title>wth are S3 tables</title>
        <link>https://mooncake.pgsty.com/blog/post/s3tables/</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
        
        <guid>https://mooncake.pgsty.com/blog/post/s3tables/</guid>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Amazon announced &lt;a href=&#34;https://aws.amazon.com/s3/features/tables/&#34;&gt;table buckets&lt;/a&gt; during re:Invent last year. An S3 bucket that&amp;rsquo;s also a table? What does that mean?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR:&lt;/strong&gt; S3 tables allow Iceberg tables to exist without a catalog. Let me explain.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;iceberg-vs-delta-lake&#34;&gt;Iceberg vs Delta Lake&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;What? I thought Iceberg and Delta are just table formats? Why are we comparing the way they&amp;rsquo;re implemented?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A key difference between Iceberg and Delta Lake is &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Delta tables can exist without a catalog, but Iceberg cannot&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;, due to their metadata design:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
